Hedonism vs. Preference Satisfaction: Two Theories of Welfare
The two leading accounts of what welfare actually consists in, and the thought experiments used to test each one.
Read research note →Welfarism as a theory of value, welfare, and moral evaluation.
Philosophical welfarism asks a narrower question than it first appears to: not whether welfare matters, but whether welfare is the only thing that matters intrinsically to moral evaluation. Answering that question requires a theory of what welfare actually consists in — pleasure, preference satisfaction, or something else — before any claim about maximizing, distributing, or constraining it can get off the ground.
The two leading accounts of what welfare actually consists in, and the thought experiments used to test each one.
Read research note →Why Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum argued that welfare should be measured in capabilities rather than resources or utility.
Read research note →A careful introduction to the relationship between welfarism and utilitarianism.
Read research note →